Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Jha, Suman Kumar
- Community Forestry: a Viable Option for Forest Management
Abstract Views :325 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Source
Indian Forester, Vol 137, No 8a (2011), Pagination: 100-104Abstract
A major challenge for government agencies such as forest departments is to ensure that all staff members are well-trained and informed in the more technical areas of conservin~ managing and using forest genetic resources. Moreover, progress towards greater participation in forestry and conservation will require knowledge of participatory approaches and means of implementing them. It is crucial that staff members, who deal with local communities, are trained in these matters. Another challenge is to avoid bureaucratic bottlenecks that hinder problem solution and communication not only between officials and local communities, but also between different levels within bureaucracies. Community Forest Management has adopted different approaches to protect the regeneratinc forests and to regulate the extraction of forest products. The idea that the local communities can protect and manage forests has gained momentum in the present day. Traditionally, the village communities have used forests even though it had remained under the custoctY of the ruler. As a result of the growing scarcity of forest based needs efforts were made by the local communities to protect and regenerate degraded forests. With the increasing number of such instances of forest protection by village communities, the concept of community forest management has established itself as a strong alternative to the eartier forest management practices. Community forest management means involvement of local communities in the protection, management and conservation of forest resoun::es based on local expertise, knowledge and need. This implies a need based management system that has come to be known as a viable means to achieve sustainable forest management.Keywords
Community Forestry, Forest Resources, Sustainable Forest Management And Forest Genetic Resources- Effectiveness of Performance Management System
Abstract Views :235 |
PDF Views:1
Authors
Sumi Jha
1,
Suman Kumar Jha
2
Affiliations
1 National Institute of Industrial Engineering, Mumbai, IN
2 Human Resource Department, Indian Register of Shipping (IR Class), Mumbai, IN
1 National Institute of Industrial Engineering, Mumbai, IN
2 Human Resource Department, Indian Register of Shipping (IR Class), Mumbai, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Industrial Relations: Economics & Social Dev., Vol 54, No 1 (2018), Pagination: 79-93Abstract
The purpose of the article is to understand the effectiveness of performance management system of organization. Authors have tried to extract the parameters of performance management effectiveness from employees of the organization. HR employees of the organization were facilitators. This article has based its argument on agency theory. Thus, based on the results a framework of effective performance management system (PMS) has been proposed.References
- Ackoff, R. L. (1999),Re-creating the Corporation: A Design of Organizations for the 21st Century, Oxford University Press, USA.
- Armstrong, M.& Baron, A. (2000), “Performance Management”, Human Resource Management: 69-84
- Bae, E. K. (2006), “Major Elements and Issues in Performance Management System: A Literature Review”, Academy of Human Resource Development International Conference (AHRD), Columbus, OH, 22-26 February, pp. 1430- 7.
- Barney, J. (1991), “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Management, 17(1): 99-120.
- Bento, A. & Bento, R. (2006), “Factors Affecting the Outcomes of Performance Management Systems, American Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) 2006”, Proceedings: 4-6 August 2006, Acapulco, Mexico.
- Bevan, S. & Thompson, M. (1991), “Performance Management at the Crossroads”, Personnel Management, 23(11): 36-9.
- Biron, M., Farndale, E. & Paauwe, J. (2011),”Performance Management Effectiveness: Lessons From World-leading Firms”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(06): 1294-11.
- Bowman, C. & Ambrosini, V. (2003), “How the Resource based and the Dynamic Capability Views of the Firm Inform Corporate level Strategy”, British Journal of Management, 14(4): 289-303.
- Boxall, P. & Gilbert, J. (2007), “The Management of Managers: A Review and Conceptual Framework”, International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(2): 95-115.
- Braun, Virginia & Victoria, Clarke (2006), “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology”, Qualitative Research in Psychology,3 (2): 93
- Brunetto, Y. & Farr Wharton, R. (2005), “The Impact of NPM on the Job Satisfaction of a Range of Australian Public Sector Employees”, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 43(2): 289-304.
- de Waal, A. A. (2004),”Stimulating Performance-driven Behavior to Obtain Better Results”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 53(4): 301-16.
- de Waal, A. A. (2007), “Successful Performance Management? Apply the Strategic Performance Management Development Cycle!” Measuring Business Excellence,11(2): 4-11.
- Edwards, M. (2002), “Public Sector Governance— Future issues for Australia”. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 61(2): 51-61.
- Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989), “Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review”,Academy of Management Review, 14(1): 57-74.
- Ferreira, A. & Otley, D. (2009), “The Design and Use of Performance Management Systems: An Extended Framework for Analysis”,Management Accounting Research, 20(4): 263-82.
- Flapper, S.D.P., Fortuin, L. & Stoop, P.P.M. (1996), “Towards Consistent Performance Management Systems’’, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16(7): 27-37.
- Franco-Santos, M. & Bourne, M. (2005), “An Examination of the Literature Relating to Issues Affecting How Companies Manage Through Measures”, Production Planning& Control, 16(2): 114-24
- Hood, C. (1991), “A Public Management for all Seasons?” Public Administration, 69(1): 319.
- Huselid, M. A. & Becker, B. E. (2011), “Bridging Micro and Macro Domains: Workforce Differentiation and Strategic Human Resource Management”, Journal of Management, 37(2), 421-28.
- Jensen, M. C. & Meckling, W. H. (1976), “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305-60
- Jugdev, K. & Mathur, G. (2006), “Project Management Elements as Strategic Assets: Preliminary Findings”, Management Research News, 29(10): 604-17.
- Lawler, E. E. (2003), “Reward Practices and Performance Management System Effectiveness”, Organizational Dynamics, 32(4): 396-404.
- Lebas, M. J. (1995), “Performance Measurement and Performance Management”, International Journal of Production Economics, 41(1-3): 23-35.
- Locke, E. A. & Latham, G. P. (2002), “Building a Practically Useful Theory of Goal Setting and Task Motivation: A 35-Year Odyssey”, American Psychologist, 57(9): 705.
- Mitchell, R. & Meacheam, D. (2011), “Knowledge Worker Control: Understanding via Principal and Agency Theory”, The Learning Organization, 18(2): 149-60.
- Munene, J. C., Schwartz, S. H. & Smith, P. B. (2000), “Development in Sub-Saharan Africa: Cultural Influences and Managers’ Decision Behavior”, Public Administration & Development, 20(4): 339.
- Neely, A. (2005), “The Evolution of Performance Measurement Research: Developments in the Last Decade and a Research Agenda for the Next”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(12): 1264-77.
- Otley, D. (1999), “Performance Management:a Framework for Management Control Systems Research”, Management Accounting Research, 10(4): 363-82.
- Shapiro, M. J., Morey, J. C., Small, S. D., Langford, V., Kaylor, C. J., Jagminas, L. & Jay, G. D. (2004), “Simulation Based Teamwork Training for Emergency Department Staff: Does It Improve Clinical Team Performance When Added to an Existing Didactic Teamwork Curriculum?” Quality and Safety in Health Care, 13(6): 417-21.
- Shore, L. M., Chung-Herrera, B. G., Dean, M. A., Ehrhart, K. H., Jung, D. I., Randel, A. E.& Singh, G. (2009), “Diversity in Organizations: Where Are We Now and Where Are We Going?”. Human Resource Management Review, 19(2): 117-33.
- Simons, T. (1995), “Top Management Team Consensus, Heterogeneity, and Debate as Contingent Predictors of Company Performance: The Complimentarity of Group Structure and Process” in Academy of Management Proceedings, 1995 (1): 62-66
- Walters, M. (Ed.) (1995), The Performance Management Handbook, Institute of Personnel and Development, London